NJ Laws Directions to Ken Vercammen and Associates Ken Vercammens Resume Ken Vercammen articles

Kenneth Vercammen & Associates
A Law Office with Experienced Attorneys for Your New Jersey Legal Needs

2053 Woodbridge Ave.
Edison NJ 08817

Personal Injury and Criminal
on Weekends 732-261-4005

Princeton Area
68 South Main St.
Cranbury, NJ 08512
By Appointment Only
Toll Free 800-655-2977

CONSENT (WHICH NEGATES AN ELEMENT model jury charge 2c:2-10

(WHICH NEGATES AN ELEMENT OF THE OFFENSE)model jury charge (N.J.S.A. 2C:2-10)

As part of his/her defense to the charge of , the defendant contends that the State has not proven each element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt because the victim consented to the alleged criminal activity. In considering this contention you should understand that consent of the victim can be a complete defense to a criminal charge only under certain limited circumstances which I will describe for you.

First, you should know that consent in the law has a meaning very similar to its everyday meaning. It is the victims voluntary and serious agreement or submission to the alleged criminal conduct or the result of that conduct. In order for consent to give rise to a valid defense it must, of course, be given freely and it must be legally effective.

Consent can never be legally effective in providing a defense to a criminal charge if:


(a) the victim was not legally competent to authorize the conduct charged to constitute the offense; or

(b) the victim was by reason of (his/her) (choose appropriate factor) youth, mental disease or defect or intoxication either known by the defendant to be unable or was manifestly unable to make a reasonable judgement as to the nature of harmfulness of the conduct charged to constitute an offense; or

(c) the victims consent was induced by force, duress or deception of a kind that the law defining the offense seeks to prevent.

In determining whether the consent of the victim was freely and voluntarily given, you are advised that consent may be openly expressed, implied, or apparent from the victims willing participation in the activity in question. Further, you may consider all that (he/she) said and did at the particular time and place, all of the surrounding circumstances and whether a normal competent person would freely and seriously consent to the conduct with which the defendant is charged.[2]

In this case, as I have already explained to you the State must prove the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:


Thus, in considering whether the State has met its burden of proof, you must determine whether the consent of the victim has negated or made it impossible for the State to prove any one of these elements. For example:

(Here discuss factual context of case, i.e., consent of victim in forgery case negates without authorization element.)


Because this case involves conduct which caused (or threatened to cause) bodily harm as I have previously defined that term for you, there is an additional requirement that must be satisfied before consent can be legally effective and give rise to a valid defense.


(1) The bodily harm consented to (or threatened by the conduct consented to) is not serious; or

(2) The conduct and the harm are reasonable foreseeable hazards of joint participation in a concerted activity of a kind not forbidden by law; or

(3) The consent establishes justification for the conduct under Chapter 3 of the code.[3]

As you consider these questions and the extent to which consent of the victim may have negated or nullified any of the elements of the offense, you are reminded that the burden remains on the State to prove each element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, in this case it is also the States burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the victim did not give legally effective consent as I have defined that term which negated any elements of the offense.

In conclusion then, if you find that the legally effective consent of the victim has prevented the State from proving each element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt, then you must find him/her not guilty.

If, on the other hand, you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the State has proven each element of the offense because the victim did not consent or because (his/her) consent was not legally effective than you must find the defendant guilty as charged.

[1] Supplemental instructions regarding individual factors and code definitions of key terms should be provided where appropriate.

[2] State v. Brown 143 N.J. Super. 571, 577 (Law Div. 1976), affd 154 N.J. Super. 511 (App. Div. 1977).

[3] Supplemental instructions regarding justification should be furnished where appropriate.

Cell Phone:
E-Mail Address

If You Do Not Include a Complete E-Mail Address, Network will not Forward Your Contact Form to the Law Office.

Details of the Case
By typing " agree" into the box you are confirming that you wish to send your information to the Law Office of Kenneth Vercammen

Kenneth Vercammen was the Middlesex County Bar Municipal Court Attorney of the Year

Meet with an experienced Attorney to handle your important legal needs.
Please call the office to schedule a confidential "in Office" consultation.
Attorneys are not permitted to provide legal advice by email.

Kenneth Vercammens Law office represents individuals charged with criminal, drug offenses, and serious traffic violations throughout New Jersey. Our office helps people with traffic/ municipal court tickets including drivers charged with Driving While Intoxicated, Refusal and Driving While Suspended.

Kenneth Vercammen was the NJ State Bar Municipal Court Attorney of the Year and past president of the Middlesex County Municipal Prosecutors Association.

Criminal and Motor vehicle violations can cost you. You will have to pay fines in court or receive points on your drivers license. An accumulation of too many points, or certain moving violations may require you to pay expensive surcharges to the N.J. DMV [Division of Motor Vehicles] or have your license suspended. Dont give up! The Law Office of Kenneth Vercammen can provide experienced attorney representation for criminal motor vehicle violations.

When your job or drivers license is in jeopardy or you are facing thousands of dollars in fines, DMV surcharges and car insurance increases, you need excellent legal representation. The least expensive attorney is not always the answer. Schedule an appointment if you need experienced legal representation in a traffic/municipal court matter.

Our website www.KennethVercammen.com provides information on traffic offenses we can be retained to represent people. Our website also provides details on jail terms for traffic violations and car insurance eligibility points. Car insurance companies increase rates or drop customers based on moving violations.

Contact the Law Office of
Kenneth Vercammen & Associates, P.C.
at 732-572-0500
for an appointment.

The Law Office cannot provide legal advice or answer legal questions over the phone or by email. Please call the Law office and schedule a confidential "in office" consultation.

Ken Vercammen articles

Ken Vercammens Resume Directions to Ken Vercammen and Associates

Disclaimer This web site is purely a public resource of general New Jersey information (intended, but not promised or guaranteed to be correct, complete, or up-to-date). It is not intended be a source of legal advice, do not rely on information at this site or others in place of the advice of competent counsel. The Law Office of Kenneth Vercammen complies with the New Jersey Rules of Professional Conduct. This web site is not sponsored or associated with any particular linked entity unless specifically stated. The existence of any particular link is simply intended to imply potential interest to the reader, inclusion of a link should not be construed as an endorsement.

Copyright 2019. Kenneth Vercammen & Associates, P.C.