NJ Laws Directions to Ken Vercammen and Associates Ken Vercammens Resume Ken Vercammen articles

Kenneth Vercammen & Associates
A Law Office with Experienced Attorneys for Your New Jersey Legal Needs

2053 Woodbridge Ave.
Edison NJ 08817

Personal Injury and Criminal
on Weekends 732-261-4005

Princeton Area
68 South Main St.
Cranbury, NJ 08512
By Appointment Only
Toll Free 800-655-2977

Civil Model Jury Charge 4.10 H. INTERPRETATION OF C


1.No Dispute over Meaning

In this case, the plaintiff and the defendant agreed to various terms that are part of the contract.Under these terms, the plaintiff was required to:

[State Terms]

The defendant was required to:

[State Terms]


When the contract terms are unambiguous, construction of the contract is a question of law for the courts.[1]The preceding charge is to be used where the parties do not dispute the existence of a contract, the terms are unambiguous and the basic dispute is over whether the contract terms were breached by either party.In such a case, the preceding may be incorporated by charging the above immediately following the first sentence in 4.10A.

2. Dispute over Meaning


When the contract terms are ambiguous and the parties dispute their meaning, construction of the contract and application of any evidence submitted to prove the surrounding circumstances are for the jury.[2]

The plaintiff claims the following terms were part of the contract.

[State Terms]

Plaintiff further claims that the parties intended this language to mean[state meaning]. The defendant denies this. The defendant contends that[state meaning]. You must decide whether the plaintiff is correct.

The plaintiff has the burden to prove what the parties intended the contract to mean. The contract is to be interpreted so as to give effect to the parties intentions. You cannot make for the parties a better contract than the parties made for themselves.[3] It is the intent expressed or apparent in the writing that controls.[4]

[The interpretive principles which follow are not intended to be exhaustive,[5]but they are intended to cover the most frequently utilized principles.]

In deciding what the parties intended, you may consider the relations of the parties, the attendant circumstances and the result the parties sought to attain.

A supporting or less significant provision of the contract is not to be interpreted to conflict with an obvious, dominant or principal purpose of the contract.[6]

You should carefully consider the wording that was used in the contract. The terms of a contract, generally, are to be understood in their plain ordinary sense. The contract is to be considered as a whole and its provisions are to be read together.

The conduct of the parties, however, after they entered into the contract and before they discovered that they disagreed with one another, can be significant evidence of their agreed intent.[7] It is up to you to decide what the conduct of the parties was, whether the conduct is reasonably related to the terms in question and whether it reveals what they intended by the contract.

A course of dealing is the manner by which parties to the contract have previously dealt with each other. Such a course of previous dealing, can, unless specifically rejected in the contract, fairly be regarded as establishing a basis for interpreting and giving meaning to the parties intention as it relates to this contract.

If any contract words or terms have a technical meaning, or as used in a trade or by custom mean something different from their ordinary meaning, you shall give them their technical trade or custom meaning if (1) the contract was made in view of this technical meaning, trade or custom usage, and (2) the technical meaning or trade or custom usage was either generally used or was actually known to the parties.


The following instruction is appropriate if the contract was drafted by just one of the parties. No case has been located which approves this instruction as modified and applied to particular paragraphs when the entire contract has been the product of joint drafting.

If you have considered all of the evidence to ascertain the intentions of the parties and you are still unable to decide what the parties originally intended the disputed contract language to mean, then that language as it exists should be interpreted against the party who wrote the contract.[8]Although the general rule is that ambiguity in a contract provision should be resolved against the drafter,[9]the ambiguous provision must still be read sensibly and consistent with the expressed intent of the parties.[10]

[1]See State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co. v. Anderson,70N.J. Super.520 524 (App. Div. 1961).

[2]State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co., supra.

[3]Karls Sales & Service v. Gimbel Brothers, 249N.J. Super.487, 493 (App. Div. 1991),certif. denied, 127N.J.548 (1991).

[4]Friedman v. Tappan Development Corp., 22N.J.523, 531 (1956).

[5]SeeRestatement (Second) of Contracts, Sec. 201 (Whose Meaning Prevails), Sec. 202 (Rules in Aid of Interpretation), Sec. 203 (Standards of Preference in Interpretation) and Sec. 204 (Supplying an Omitted Essential Term) (1981).

[6]Newark Publishers Assn v. Newark Typographical Union, 22N.J.419, 426-27 (1956).

[7][T]he conduct of the parties after execution of the contract is entitled to great weight in determining its meaning.Joseph Hilton and Assoc., Inc. v. Evans, 201N.J. Super.156, 171 (App. Div.),certif. denied, 101N.J.326 (1985).

[8]It may be argued that when the non-drafting party is sophisticated, the rule that ambiguity should be resolved against the drafter should not apply.The Supreme Court has addressed the issue in the analogous case of insurance contracts, which arguably involve drafters who often exercise greater control and are therefore less deserving of an exception to the rule than drafters of other contracts.The Supreme Court stated that the rule that ambiguous insurance contracts are construed against the insurer would not apply in the case of a sophisticated insured.See Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Ins. Co., 138N.J.437, 471 (1994).(As the Appellate Division noted, O-I was a sophisticated insured and cannot seek refuge in the doctrine of strict construction by pretending it is the corporate equivalent of the unschooled, average consumer.)However, the law is not entirely clear as to what qualifies a party as a sophisticated insured.The Appellate Division inOwens-Illinois, Inc.described the law in other jurisdictions to be that only where it is clear that an insurance policy was actually negotiated or jointly drafted, and where the policyholder has bargaining power and sophistication, is the rule of strict construction of policy terms against the insurer not invoked.Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Ins. Co., 264N.J. Super.460, 489 (App. Div. 1993),revd on other grounds, 138N.J.437 (1994).See also Diamond Shamrock Chem. Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.,258N.J. Super.167, 209 (App. Div. 1992),certif. denied, 134N.J.481 (1993).If sophisticated is simply shorthand for a co-drafter, then the rule that ambiguity is resolved against the drafter would not apply simply because both parties drafted the contract.However, if the sophisticated party with bargaining power negotiated the substance of a contract term, but did not actually draft the contract language, perhaps he or she would not enjoy the benefits of the rule of interpretation.

[9]In re Miller, 90N.J.210, 221 (1982).

[10]Karls Sales and Serv., Inc. v. Gimbel Bros., Inc.,supra.

Cell Phone:
E-Mail Address

If You Do Not Include a Complete E-Mail Address, Network will not Forward Your Contact Form to the Law Office.

Details of the Case
By typing " agree" into the box you are confirming that you wish to send your information to the Law Office of Kenneth Vercammen

Kenneth Vercammen was the Middlesex County Bar Municipal Court Attorney of the Year

New Article of the Week

Meet with an experienced Attorney to handle your important legal needs.
Please call the office to schedule a confidential "in Office" consultation.
Attorneys are not permitted to provide legal advice by email.

Since 1985, KENNETH VERCAMMEN has worked as a personal injury attorney, working for injury victims and their families. By taking a hard-hitting, aggressive approach toward the insurance companies, KENNETH VERCAMMEN and our co-counsel have consistently obtained outstanding results for many injured clients over the years I am proud to have worked on cases in various capacities, small and large. While obviously prior results cannot guarantee the outcome of future cases, I can guarantee that you case will receive the same degree of dedication and hard work that went into each of these prior cases.

In direct contrast to the hard-hitting approach we take toward the insurance companies is the soft approach we take toward our clients. I am proud of my compassionate staff as I am of the outstanding financial results they have achieved. For many years, I have watched them treat our clients with patience, dignity and respect. I would have it no other way.

Many years ago, I attended a seminar sponsored by the American Bar Association on Law Practice Management. This was to help insure that each of our clients is always treated like a person -- not a file! We recognize that you are innocent victims and that you have placed your trust in us. Please understand that we understand what you are going through. Feel comforted that we are here to help you.

If you retain KENNETH VERCAMMEN to represent you, we will give you the same advice we give each of our clients -- concentrate on your life, you family and your health. We will take care of everything else. Leave all of the work and worry about your legal rights to us. Trust us. Believe in us. Have faith in us as your attorneys. Understand that we will always to do what we believe is best for you and your case. Helping you is our job. In fact, it is our only job -- guiding injury victims like you through one of the most difficult times of your lives, with care and concern -- while fighting aggressively to the limits of the law to obtain compensation and justice for each of you!

Print our Personal Injury Questionnaire on our Website, Fill it out and Fax back, so we can determine if we can help you obtain an injury settlement. We would welcome an opportunity to prove to you what we have proven to thousands of injured clients -- that you can feel comfortable and secure in the fact that KENNETH VERCAMMEN - Trial Attorney We Fight To Win.

When you have been injured in an accident or collision, you are worried about who is going to pay your medical bills, lost wages, and other damages. The last thing you want is to be taken advantage of by an insurance company. If you dont protect your rights, you may not be able to make a claim.

Insurance companies have attorneys and adjusters whose goal is to pay you as little as they can. You need a New Jersey personal injury lawyer to fight for you. I am dedicated to helping your recover as much money as possible under the law.

You need an attorney who will work hard to protect your rights, maximize your insurance settlement and minimize the hassles of dealing with the insurance companies. You need an experienced and aggressive New Jersey trial lawyer with PROVEN RESULTS who will fight for you. Having an experienced personal injury lawyer can make the difference between getting what you deserve and getting nothing.

Without the threat of a lawyer who is willing to go to trial and seek a big jury verdict, why would an insurance company pay you what your claim is really worth? Lawsuits can be expensive, and many people do not have the money to pursue their claim. In every case, I advance all costs associated with pursuing your case and I do not ask you for a penny until we recover from the other side.

I am an experienced aggressive trial lawyer and a 3rd degree Black Belt. I am not afraid to take your case to trial if that is what it takes to maximize the amount of money your recover for your personal injury. I offer one-on-one service, and I will not hand your case off to an inexperienced lawyer or a paralegal.

Reduce the stress of making a claim.

Personal injury accidents can turn your life upside down. Making a personal injury claim can be difficult and time consuming. Once I take your case, you can stop worrying about dealing with the insurance companies and focus on recovering from your injuries. I take care of all of the paperwork, phone calls, and negotiations, so you can get on with your life.

p.s. For those clients who are afraid or reluctant to go to Court, KENNETH VERCAMMEN also offers a special -- For Settlement Only -- program. This means that if we are unable to settle with the insurance company, we will not go any further -- unless you want us to. You have my personal assurance that there will be absolutely no pressure and no obligation.

We handle personal injury cases on a contingency fee basis.


Call our office to schedule a "confidential" appointment 732-572-0500

Kenneth A. Vercammen is the Managing Attorney at Kenneth Vercammen & Associates in Edison, NJ. He is a New Jersey trial attorney has devoted a substantial portion of his professional time to the preparation and trial of litigated matters. He has appeared in Courts throughout New Jersey each week on personal injury matters, Criminal /Municipal Court trials, and contested Probate hearings.

Mr. Vercammen has published over 125 legal articles in national and New Jersey publications on criminal, elder law, probate and litigation topics. He is a highly regarded lecturer on litigation issues for the American Bar Association, NJ ICLE, New Jersey State Bar Association and Middlesex County Bar Association. His articles have been published in noted publications included New Jersey Law Journal, ABA Law Practice Management Magazine, and New Jersey Lawyer. He is the Editor in Chief of the American Bar Association Tort and Insurance Committee Newsletter.

Admitted In NJ, US Supreme Court and Federal District Court.

Contact the Law Office of
Kenneth Vercammen & Associates, P.C.
at 732-572-0500
for an appointment.

The Law Office cannot provide legal advice or answer legal questions over the phone or by email. Please call the Law office and schedule a confidential "in office" consultation.

.Ken Vercammen articles

Ken Vercammens Resume
Directions to Ken Vercammen and Associates

Disclaimer This web site is purely a public resource of general New Jersey information (intended, but not promised or guaranteed to be correct, complete, or up-to-date). It is not intended be a source of legal advice, do not rely on information at this site or others in place of the advice of competent counsel. The Law Office of Kenneth Vercammen complies with the New Jersey Rules of Professional Conduct. This web site is not sponsored or associated with any particular linked entity unless specifically stated. The existence of any particular link is simply intended to imply potential interest to the reader, inclusion of a link should not be construed as an endorsement.

Copyright 2019. Kenneth Vercammen & Associates, P.C.